Become a Member

Get access to more than 30 brands, premium video, exclusive content, events, mapping, and more.

Already have an account? Sign In

Become a Member

Get access to more than 30 brands, premium video, exclusive content, events, mapping, and more.

Already have an account? Sign In



FDA Seeks to Change Definition of ‘Healthy’ Foods

The new FDA proposal could change the marketing and packaging of certain cereals, nuts, and other categories

Lock Icon

Unlock this article and more benefits with 40% off.

Already have an Outside Account? Sign in

Outside+ Logo

40% Off Outside+.
$4.99/month $2.99/month*

Get the one subscription to fuel all your adventures.

  • Map your next adventure with our premium GPS apps: Gaia GPS Premium and Trailforks Pro.
  • Read unlimited digital content from 15+ brands, including Outside Magazine, Triathlete, Ski, Trail Runner, and VeloNews.
  • Watch 600+ hours of endurance challenges, cycling and skiing action, and travel documentaries.
  • Learn from the pros with expert-led online courses.
Join Outside+

*Outside memberships are billed annually. You may cancel your membership at anytime, but no refunds will be issued for payments already made. Upon cancellation, you will have access to your membership through the end of your paid year. More Details

On September 28, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) proposed to change the nutrition requirements for packaged food products the agency considers “healthy.” It’s a movement to re-examine foods that may be misidentified as such, like certain cereals, highly sweetened granola bars, white breads, and yogurts.

About five percent of all packaged foods are labeled “healthy” — under current guidelines, food manufacturers are allowed to add the word to many of their products’ packages, as long as the nutrition labels adhere to limits on total fat, saturated fat, cholesterol, and sodium, and can provide at least 10 percent of the daily value of vitamins. But there’s no limit on added sugars. At the same time, foods like avocados and nuts don’t currently qualify for the “healthy” label because their fat content is above the FDA’s requirement of less than 1 gram of fat per serving, even though they’re generally considered to be good, healthy fats.

In order for foods to be deemed “healthy” under the new proposal, which can take up to a year to pass, packaged products would need to adhere to specific maximum amounts of sodium and saturated fat, as well as added sugars. They also must contain a certain amount of food from at least one of the nine food groups recommended by the Dietary Guidelines for Americans.

These requirements emphasize whether a food fits into a healthy diet overall and focuses less on individual nutrients. A cereal, for example, would need to contain .75 ounces of whole grains and no more than 2.5 grams of added sugars to be considered healthy. So far there’s been little pushback on the proposal from large food manufacturers.

“I’m thrilled to see the definition of healthy getting a much-needed facelift,” says Elizabeth Shaw, a registered dietician. “With redefining healthy foods to include foods that were once demonized based solely on their higher fat content, we’re reinforcing to consumers that the foods health professionals are encouraging them to include more regularly in their diet are in fact healthy.”

Still, both Shaw and registered dietician Andrea Givens say that the term “healthy” can be subjective. “Eating one ‘healthy’ thing like an apple doesn’t make us healthy, just like how eating one hamburger doesn’t make us unhealthy,” Givens says. “Our health is a result of our daily choices and behaviors consistently over time.” Givens also notes that some of the healthiest foods at the grocery store don’t have a label at all — things like colorful fruits and vegetables and grass-fed protein.